When asked whether or not universities nationwide should increase regulation in the form of educational programs, changes to campus health service diagnosing protocols, etc. to curb the illicit use of ADHD medication, respondents are fair evenly divided. Of the people who decided to share their thoughts on this issue, 29 said "yes," 33 said "no," and 4 were undecided.
The prevailing attitude for the "yes's" is that illicit use confers an unfair advantage to those who do not medically need the drugs. This group tends to see illicit use as a University Honor Code violation and places importance on educating younger students about the risks of illegally taking these drugs.
The prevailing attitude for the "no's" is that there is no meaningful regulation that can be implemented to deter students from illicitly using ADHD medication. This group largely believes that illicit use would continue no matter what, and therefore sees regulation as a waste of time and resources.
The prevailing attitude for the "yes's" is that illicit use confers an unfair advantage to those who do not medically need the drugs. This group tends to see illicit use as a University Honor Code violation and places importance on educating younger students about the risks of illegally taking these drugs.
The prevailing attitude for the "no's" is that there is no meaningful regulation that can be implemented to deter students from illicitly using ADHD medication. This group largely believes that illicit use would continue no matter what, and therefore sees regulation as a waste of time and resources.